Post a Secret
Wednesday, June 29, 2005PostSecret
The hospital's website has several videos about the procedure and the results. Give it a few years and people might feel and look natural.The world's first bionic man, Jesse Sullivan, 54, accidentally touched live wires while working as a utility lineman in Tennessee. He suffered severe burns, causing him to lose his arms.
[...]
When Sullivan's brain tells his arm to do something, it's done in seconds and he has feeling in the bionic arm.
[...]
By the time it's perfected, the cost of manufacturing the bionic arm is expected to be about $6 million, according to the report.
another sourcefor his comparison between the U.S. and European countries doesn't help much here. Looking further for the source of the mentioned crime numbers ("4161 6941 9927") reveals that several weblogs beside Dailypundit copied it one from the other, always citing an Interpol source that's not available (or not available any more). In dubio pro reo, let's suppose the numbers are from Interpol and are correct (there are other official sources, that still leaves us with the question what's the connection to the topic at hand? The numbers for the United States are lower than for European countries that abolished the death penalty, but it's not about homicides, but a general crime rate which can't be proven to be influenced only by the (existence or abolition of the) death penalty. I don't want to invoke the obligatory
apples and orangesargument, but let's rather stick to the homicide rate.
must now be seen to be inhuman and degradingand abolished capital punishment in 1973. Note that the last time an execution took place in Britain was 1964 - details here. Here's the UK Crime Reduction website Curzon took a look at but unfortunately didn't find the homicide rate chart. Although there is a upwards trend, it is decreasing since 2002/2003. The homicide rate in England and Wales in 2000 was at 1.5 per 100,000 (USA: 5.9): This is not about trends, just a synchronous comparison. Homicide rate London - Washington B.C. between 1998 and 2000: 528 and 733 (which translates to a homicide rate of 2.38 per 100,000 in London and 45,79 in Washington!). Between 1996 and 2000, the homicide rate fell about 1% in all Europe (+25% in England, -10% in France). Russia, as another example saw a drop of 2% in the same time period. They still have capital punishment, although they're not using it.
Japan's Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications published a long term statistic about the crime rate in Japan here and a bilingual document from 2005 titled 刑法犯の罪名別認知件数,検挙件数及び検挙人員 (Canadian research on the deterrent effect of punishment has reached the same conclusion as the overwhelming majority of US studies: the death penalty has no special value as a deterrent when compared to other punishments. In fact, the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police has stated: "It is futile to base an argument for reinstatement on grounds of deterrence".
penal code crime cases known to the police, cases cleared up and arrestees by type of crime (1980 to 2002)) - the numbers for homicide are decreasing, by the way. Charles Lane gives more insight about the death penalty in Japan.
there has been a general increase in crimeover the last 25 years (1995). It also mentiones reasons why crime has increased - but don't be surprised if you don't find
abolition of capital punishmentin the list.
brief outline of the evidence that the death penalty reduces crime. The post was triggered by a remark from my side that referred to a post about the Death Penalty in Japan on June 2nd.
Wow, homicides cut in half! That’s quite an accomplishment.)? I agree, it is an accomplishment, but who or what do you have to thank for? Curzon speaks of a
correlation, but he completely fails to show a connection between capital punishment and the changing homicide rate. He also makes the mistake to focus too much on one rather short period of time. If we take a few steps back and look at the big picture, you will find two peaks in the 20th century where homicide rates in the U.S. peaked. The first one was in the early 30s (keyword
prohibition) with a homicide rate of 9,7 per 100,000 citizens and the second one was during the 80s (keyword
war against drugs), as mentioned by Curzon, with a twice reocurring homicide rate of about 10 per 100,000 citizens until the 1990s. Following his argumentation, we would have to presuppose a rare use of the death penalty in 1930 and 1980.
during highly publicized death penalty cases the homicide rate is found to go down but it goes back up when the case is over, so that people react to it - Jon Manning, Curzon and alike fail to see that offenders don't think logically. Murders are not logical per se, no murderer plans to be caught or wants to be caught or recieve the death penalty as a consequence of his (or her) doing. If you take Japan as an example, Younghusband already described the system there as very low-profile, how can it act as a deterrence if it's low-profile? This part of your theory, Curzon, has no foundation.
That reminded me of something Dr. Ruprecht Vondran said last year after a lecture on economic issues: Germans can't and don't define anymore who they are and don't love they country any more. In Europe, they're loosing their cultural and nationalThey are much too self-deprecating. In fact, other Western European nations give Germany the highest global favorability ratings of any of the five leading nations (U.S., France, China, Japan and Germany) covered by the survey.
contour. If you ask people about the British, French or Italians, they have a certain image in their mind. If you ask them about the Germans, it's getting increasingly difficult. While I don't see this much of a problem - define yourself as a European and you'll be fine - I even see it as an advantage that pride is not a word(many) Germans connect with their country. I had a similar talk about the topic with Sir Francis in Japan some five years ago. Being proud of your country makes you vulnerable, since attaching emotions to such complex, amorph structures as countries leaves lots of opportunities to be criticized and in the course hurt. If you're hurt, you're open to revenge, and revenge and irrationality lead to arguments and possibly armed hostilities (sounds Yoda-ish, but I hope you get my point ;-) ). There's nothing wrong with working hard to give something back to society, in the contrary.
violentand
rude, the relationship is deteriorating. Nevertheless, please correct me if I'm wrong, but I still see a difference between the U.S. government and its people. Of course, it got harder to differentiate between those two since George W. Bush's re-election as all reasons why the U.S. government has been critized in the U.S. and abroad were already on the table before the election. It's a democracy after all, so it's not far off to say that the people have a reponsebility when it comes to their duly elected leaders. In the end, every people deserves the government they have, but I'm not so sure
If two countries that had serious ...misunderstandings over centuries can get as close as they are now, I'd say that's reason to be optimistic for all of Europe. It might be difficult at the moment, but there's hope for the future. By speaking of which, one third in contrast to the rest of the country in Germany thinks immigration is a bad idea. I don't want to get too far into demographics, xenophobia and national immigration policies, but that's one of the big omissions our government has allowed itself. Being the son of immigrants myself, I have a slightly different angle on the issue than the afore mentioned two thirds. Those people are afraid to loose the way of life they're used to, in case there are too many foreigners coming (In fact, even the French give Germany a higher favorability rating (89%) than they give their own country (74%). The Germans, however, return the favor, giving France a 78% favorability rating, higher than the 64% they give their own country.
the boat is fullargument), but that is in my opinion rather a general problem than one connected to immigration. The German way of life changed drastically in the last 50, in the last 100 years, and the developement towards another drastic change is not stoppable. This country need skilled workers, people who don't only cohabitate but bear children. Does future sociocultural, genetic or otherwise diversity scare you? Take a look at the mayor cities, almost 20% of Düsseldorf's citizens are foreigners, and nobody can deny that life is good here. In fact, Düsseldorf is one of the wealthiest cities in Germany, just as one argument for the people who are afraid of decreasing economic strength. Diversity is not a threat, it is a neccessity - just as it is change. Call it progess.
Justin Klein's descriptions of his amazing experiences at Ritsumeikan University- currently a 留学生 (foreign student) at Rits! There're also pictures of of Kyoto - 懐かしい! - and the new I-House - there are two now and I heard they're building another one. There're other I-House bloggers as well, take a look at dubious adventures, Bootleg YHM and Yamasama. I read Mutantfrog's weblog before, but didn't know he studied at Rits, too.
main personality traitand there you go. A list of names the randomizer offered:
Blue Brain project: Mission to build a simulated brain beginsIt will be the first time humans will be able to observe the electrical code our brains use to represent the world, and to do so in real time, ...
[...]
The end product, which will take at least a decade to achieve, can then be stimulated and observed to see how different parts of the brain behave.
I'm really irritated by the Japanese people' high support for capital punishment. I'll try to find some information about what were the pro and con reasons given. Can't say for sure whether it's for real, but I found a picture of the gallows in the Osaka detention center here. I assume Toyoko Ogino's misunderstanding of theUnlike capital punishment in the United States, Japan’s death penalty is on the rise. Japanese officials keep state executions out of public view and shrouded in secrecy. Not even the condemned prisoners know the day they will die. Step inside the gallows for a rare look at how Japan takes a life.
[...]
Not only is Japan the only member of the Group of Seven industrialized countries other than the United States to retain capital punishment, it is also increasing its use of the death penalty.
[...]
In Japan, death row prisoners are not told in advance of their execution dates—a practice international human rights organizations condemn as a form of psychological torment.
[...]
Perhaps the most notorious such miscarriage of justice involved Sakae Menda, who in 1948, at the age of 23, was convicted of a double ax murder. The conviction was based on the contradiction-riddled testimony of a prostitute and Menda’s own confession, extracted after spending 80 hours in a police station without sleep.
[...]
...it seems incredible that confessions are not given to the court as either tapes or verbatim transcripts. Rather, they are rewritten and summarized by the authorities themselves.
[...]
Toyoko Ogino, an interpreter I worked with in the coal-mining town of Omuta, was surprised when I told her that prisoners were hanged. “I thought that was just an expression,” she said.
[...]
Polls indicate that public support for capital punishment is even stronger in Japan than in the United States—more than 81 percent in a February 2005 survey.
[...]
Five guards press separate buttons simultaneously. Only one of these is the button that actually opens the trap door. And all of this takes place outside the witnesses’ field of vision—offstage, as it were. There is a hanging, but no identifiable hangman.
expressionwas most probably a reference and mix-up to
首を切る(kubi wo kiru), which directly translated means something along the lines of
to decollate s.o.. This expression is used when somebody loses his job, but
絞首する(koushu suru) doesn't actually carry a metaphoric meaning except
to decollate s.o..
The vast majority of them in China, though. In regard to the death penalty, Japan and the United States are among countries such as China, Iran, Viet Nam, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Kuwait, Bangladesh, Egypt, Singapore, Yemen and North Korea. Amnesty International has more facts about the issue here.In 2004, there were at least 3,797 executions in 25 countries around the world. China, Iran, the United States, and Viet Nam were responsible for 94 percent of these known executions.
statement about unfulfillness of contemporary love- but also reminiscient of Francisco Goya in a clever and very amusing way.